Log In
Sign Up and Get Started Blogging!
JoeUser is completely free to use! By Signing Up on JoeUser, you can create your own blog and participate on the blogs of others!
Dabe's Site
A beginner's work in progress.......
Look Who's Counting
Published on August 9, 2005 By
dabe
In
Politics
Article Link
Article Tags
politics
Popular Articles in this Category
Let's see your political memes
Popular Articles from dabe
The Confederate Flag
Dumbya Is Getting Hammered
Yet Another Crony
Me
This is NOT the Death of America
Comments
1
Lee1776
on Aug 09, 2005
Dabe
The death rate of combat wounded is 10%, far lower then the 30% of WWII and 24% of Vietnam. This info comes from the Harvard Gazette:
Link
If you are saying that 9,000 soldier have died outside of Iraq and about only 29% of
combat
wounded ever even leave Iraq for medical treatment, then that would mean that about 300,000 soldier have been
combat
wounded of the 1,048,884 soldier who have rotated through Iraq.
Link
That would be almost a full one third of the soldiers.
Of the four units from my State's National Guard that has served or are serving in Iraq (a total of 434 soldier), only one has been wounded to an IED (sent to Germany) and one died in a roll over accident. Three of these units would be considered high risk units. I guess that some how one third of those soldiers forgot about being wounded. Then lets say ten percent of those wounded (14), standing in the welcome home formation forgot they died of those wounds. Also none of those soldier's families even noticed that they came home in a coffin.
Only 13,189 soldiers have received medical treatment in Iraq for every thing ranging from a John Kerry wound, sick stomach, vehicle accident, or actual combat wound.
Link
2
dabe
on Aug 10, 2005
The death rate of combat wounded is 10%, far lower then the 30% of WWII and 24% of Vietnam. This info comes from the Harvard Gazette: Link
I'm aware of these numbers. Yes, we've become really good at keeping them alive, sans arms, legs and sight, but they are alive. Mostly happy to be alive, I would imagine. And, I'm not disputing your numbers here. In fact, you've given me quite the pause, so I've done my own digging to see exactly what the death toll is about.
What I continue to come up with, including the links you posted, is that the 1800 plus is the accurate number. What finally convinced me that the Doonesbury cartoon is off is the Daily Kos article
Link
basically debunking the 9,000 number. And, it does make sense. It's a good read. Exerpted here:
......For about the past year and a half, Michael and I have been joined in the research by Evan D., an historian in the Washington D.C. area, and by Lynn L., another researcher whose husband is in the 4th ID. So that makes 4 of us searching the news media and the military sites, each and every day mind you, for deaths.And after all this time, we all four of us concur. Yes, there are a few unreported deaths, which I'll explain in a minute. But not thousands. We'd have found them if there were. ...........
I suppose I could take down the article, but I won't. I'll leave it up as a debunker. Thanks, Lee, for your response.
3
Island Dog
on Aug 11, 2005
Imagine that. Someone getting their "facts" from a cartoon and far left website.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!
Sign Up Now!
Meta
Views
» 1655
Comments
»
3
Category
»
Politics
Comment
Recent Article Comments
Let's see your political mem...
LightStar Design Windowblind...
Let's start a New Jammin Thr...
A day in the Life of Odditie...
Safe and free software downl...
Veterans Day
A new and more functional PC...
Post your joy
AI Art Thread: 2022
WD Black Internal and Extern...
Sponsored Links